Confirmed model pricing

Compare a workload against dated model rates.

Estimate monthly token costs without sending your workload to a model. Only human-confirmed published pricing is used; unpublished rates and missing history stay unknown.

Fast scope

Want TeamShift to handle this?

Tell us what is happening now and where to reach you. We scope the work and the next step.

How would you like help?

Estimate a monthly model workload

USD token charges only, using dated human-confirmed published rates for each exact provider, model and SKU. This is an estimate, not an invoice, a provider quote or TeamShift pricing. Taxes, tools, hosting and non-token fees are excluded.

Checking published pricing…

Guide

Use this before you automate the work

Estimate monthly token costs without sending your workload to a model. Only human-confirmed published pricing is used; unpublished rates and missing history stay unknown.

Step 1

Keep the exact rate scope

Compare provider, model, SKU, unit and effective date together. An archived observation is not evidence that a rate was effective earlier. Missing input or output prices do not become zero.

  • Keep rate date, SKU and unit together.
  • Cache tokens are included in total input, not added twice.

Step 2

Inspect publication evidence

The calculator reads the existing canonical pricing-history export. JSON, CSV and change RSS become available with actual confirmed publication. Daily provider coverage and history back to 2023 are not claimed until that corpus exists.

  • Unpublished rates stay unknown.
  • No sample pricing or synthetic confirmations are included.

Questions

Before you hand this off

Is this a complete bill?

No. It is a hypothetical USD token estimate. Taxes, tools, infrastructure, non-token charges and TeamShift customer prices are separate.

What happens when rates are unavailable?

The calculator shows unknown and does not substitute sample rates, internal model defaults or unverified pricing changes.